Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 1031 days newer than Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-7920X - 137 vs 130 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 105 vs 140 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€579.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13441 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |