Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4376 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 31% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-2700K - 225 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - €91.04 vs €577.84
- Up to 79% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-14900KF - €0.53 vs €2.57 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
225
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.57/FPS
20%
Price, €
€577.84
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €577.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
172
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€91.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €91.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900KF | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |