Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3550S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3550S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4188 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3550S.
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 19% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-3550S - 152 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550S - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Core i5-3550S
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - €242.19 vs €468.37
- Up to 39% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-14900KF - €1.89 vs €3.08 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
152
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.08/FPS
61%
Price, €
€468.37
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for €468.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 329 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
128
84%
Value, €/FPS
€1.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€242.19
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €242.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 329 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900KF | vs | Core i5-3550S |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |