Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-10600K - 225 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600K - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - €113.26 vs €547.76
- Up to 76% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-14900KF - €0.59 vs €2.43 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
225
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.43/FPS
24%
Price, €
€547.76
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €547.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4342 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €113.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4343 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |