Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i9-10900F - 239 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €304.9 vs €595.97
- Up to 43% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i9-14900K - €1.43 vs €2.49 per FPS
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
239
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.49/FPS
57%
Price, €
€595.97
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for €595.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
213
89%
Value, €/FPS
€1.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€304.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €304.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |