Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2561 days newer than Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 22% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-7100 - 495 vs 407 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
407
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |