Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms Core i5-14400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 and Core i5-14400F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Core i5-14400F - 167 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-14900
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Core i5-14400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-14400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Single-Core
2350
79.76917854718262%
Multi-Core
11359
71.60688394376852%
Intel Core i9-14900 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
