Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2200 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 50% better in Dirt 5 than Core i5-7600 - 270 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €113.81 vs €675.29
- Up to 75% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-13900KS - €0.63 vs €2.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
270
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.5/FPS
25%
Price, €
€675.29
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €675.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
180
66%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €113.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i5-7600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |