Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3178 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 18% better in Deathloop than Core i5-4690 - 206 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €79.81 vs €675.29
- Up to 86% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-13900KS - €0.46 vs €3.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 84 vs 150 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.28/FPS
14%
Price, €
€675.29
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €675.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
175
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €79.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 84 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |