Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 667 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 9% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-11600KF - 200 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €167.82 vs €675.29
- Up to 73% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-13900KS - €0.91 vs €3.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 125 vs 150 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
200
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.38/FPS
26%
Price, €
€675.29
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €675.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
184
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€167.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €167.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |