Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 667 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11500.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 8% better in Death Stranding than Core i5-11500 - 253 vs 234 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11500 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €152.9 vs €690.13
- Up to 76% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i9-13900KS - €0.65 vs €2.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
253
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.73/FPS
23%
Price, €
€690.13
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €690.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10939 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
234
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€152.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €152.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10939 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |