Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1358 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i5-9400F - 283 vs 235 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €162.65 vs €495.9
- Up to 61% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i9-13900KF - €0.69 vs €1.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
283
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.75/FPS
39%
Price, €
€495.9
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €495.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 415 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
235
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€162.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €162.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 415 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |