Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1853 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 26% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 214 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €329.0 vs €495.9
- Up to 16% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-13900KF - €1.94 vs €2.32 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.32/FPS
83%
Price, €
€495.9
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for €495.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 428 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
170
79%
Value, €/FPS
€1.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€329
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €329 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 429 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |