Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 21% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-7600K - 214 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €349.9 vs €530.38
- Up to 20% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-13900K - €1.98 vs €2.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 91 vs 125 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.48/FPS
79.83870967741935%
Price, €
€530.38
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for €530.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
177
82.71028037383178%
Value, €/FPS
€1.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€349.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €349.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1507
50.67249495628783%
Multi-Core
4226
20.974786579313083%
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 91 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |