Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2644 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Dead Space than Core i5-6400 - 167 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €89.94 vs €520.99
- Up to 81% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-13900K - €0.6 vs €3.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.12/FPS
19%
Price, €
€520.99
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €520.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
Buy for €89.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |