Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2682 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-6700T - 227 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €122.58 vs €578.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-13900F - €0.61 vs €2.55 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €578 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
201
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€122.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €122.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |