Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2744 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i7-6700 - 243 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €139.91 vs €407.64
- Up to 61% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i9-13900F - €0.65 vs €1.68 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
243
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.68/FPS
38.69047619047619%
Price, €
€407.64
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for €407.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
215
88.47736625514403%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€139.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €139.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1293
47.36263736263736%
Multi-Core
4140
24.043208084093155%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |