Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4090 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 68% better in Dirt 5 than Core i7-2700K - 249 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €105.52 vs €570.0
- Up to 69% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-13900F - €0.71 vs €2.29 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €570 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
148
59%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€105.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €105.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |