Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 5% better in The Outer Worlds than Core i5-10600KF - 218 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €126.14 vs €417.11
- Up to 68% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Core i9-13900F - €0.61 vs €1.91 per FPS
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
218
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.91/FPS
31%
Price, €
€417.11
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for €417.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2384 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
207
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€126.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €126.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2385 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |