Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-10600K - 136 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600K - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €162.65 vs €579.08
- Up to 69% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-13900F - €1.31 vs €4.26 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.26/FPS
30%
Price, €
€579.08
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €579.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
91%
Value, €/FPS
€1.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€162.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €162.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |