Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 15% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i5-10600 - 291 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €209.99 vs €396.72
- Up to 39% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i9-13900F - €0.83 vs €1.36 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
291
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.36/FPS
61.02941176470588%
Price, €
€396.72
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for €396.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1640 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
254
87.2852233676976%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€209.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1641 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1579
57.83882783882785%
Multi-Core
6175
35.86154828968001%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-10600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |