Buy on Amazon
€577.41
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 22% better in Valorant than Core i5-10400 - 949 vs 778 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €102.5 vs €577.41
- Up to 79% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-13900F - €0.13 vs €0.61 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
949
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
21%
Price, €
€577.41
17%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-13900F Desktop-Prozessor 24 Kerne (8 P-cores und 16 E-cores) 36 MB Cache, bis zu 5,6 GHz
Buy for €577.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 379 minutes ago
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
778
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€102.5
100%
Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-10400 Desktop-Prozessor, 6 Kerne, bis zu 4,3 GHz, LGA1200 (Chipsatz der Intel® 400er-Reihe), 65 W
Buy for €102.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
