Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-10300 - 246 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €204.87 vs €396.72
- Up to 44% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i9-13900F - €0.9 vs €1.61 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
246
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
55.90062111801242%
Price, €
€396.72
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for €396.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1643 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
228
92.6829268292683%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
100%
Price, €
€204.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €204.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1643 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1565
57.32600732600732%
Multi-Core
4795
27.847145594982287%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |