Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 22% better in Alan Wake 2 than Ryzen 5 2600X - 134 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €130.37 vs €396.72
- Up to 60% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i9-13900F - €1.19 vs €2.96 per FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.96/FPS
40.2027027027027%
Price, €
€396.72
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €396.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1626 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
110
82.08955223880598%
Value, €/FPS
€1.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€130.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €130.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1627 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1237
45.311355311355314%
Multi-Core
5263
30.565073465358033%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |