Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 45% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-8350 - 132 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €155.88 vs €396.72
- Up to 43% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-13900F - €1.71 vs €3.01 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.01/FPS
56.81063122923589%
Price, €
€396.72
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €396.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1624 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
91
68.93939393939394%
Value, €/FPS
€1.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€155.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1624 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |