Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600KF on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 54% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-10600KF - 94 vs 61 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - €126.31 vs €498.71
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €498.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
Buy for €126.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1686
62.122328666175385%
Multi-Core
6819
41.513454279800314%
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |