Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 2744 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 34% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G1840 - 203 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.88/FPS
100%
Price, €
€381.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €381.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900KF | vs | Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |