Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 2986 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 54% better in New World than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 149 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 80 vs 125 Watts
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€427
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €427 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10684 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 80 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |