Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 2024 days newer than Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 7% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 161 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €520.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75950 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
47.71532551556813%
Multi-Core
5480
42.01165286721864%
Intel Core i9-12900 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |