Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 21 days older than the cheaper Core i5-12600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-12600 - 127 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - €303.52 vs €520.52
- Up to 41% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-12900 - €2.43 vs €4.1 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
127
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.1/FPS
59.26829268292684%
Price, €
€520.52
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for €520.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
125
98.4251968503937%
Value, €/FPS
€2.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€303.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €303.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Single-Core
2371
95.87545491306106%
Multi-Core
9721
74.5246856792395%
Intel Core i9-12900 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |