Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 1608 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 6% better in The Outer Worlds than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 215 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - €102.0 vs €520.52
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €520.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75426 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
202
93.95348837209302%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€102
100%
Buy for €102 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75427 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
47.472705216336436%
Multi-Core
6976
53.480527445568846%
Intel Core i9-12900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |