Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900T outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900T is 3305 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900T
- Performs up to 25% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-6200 - 143 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i9-11900T
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900T | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 3 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
