Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 4207 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 30% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-860 - 149 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - €45.78 vs €260.99
- Up to 77% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-11900KF - €0.4 vs €1.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.75/FPS
22%
Price, €
€260.99
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €260.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Buy for €45.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |