Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 2479 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Core i5-4690K - 205 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - €89.07 vs €260.99
- Up to 65% better value when playing Control than Core i9-11900KF - €0.44 vs €1.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 88 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.27/FPS
34%
Price, €
€260.99
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for €260.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
201
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-4690K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 88 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |