Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-3330 - 186 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - €40.13 vs €263.68
- Up to 83% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-11900KF - €0.24 vs €1.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
186
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.42/FPS
16%
Price, €
€263.68
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €263.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
168
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €40.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |