Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3960X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900K is 477 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 209 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - €283.62 vs €1506.42
- Up to 83% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - €1.36 vs €7.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 125 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900K - 48 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
209
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€283.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €283.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8564 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
193
92%
Value, €/FPS
€7.81/FPS
17%
Price, €
€1506.42
18%
Buy for €1,506.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8564 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 48 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |