Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 1435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 9% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 5 1400 - 187 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - €167.49 vs €283.62
- Up to 36% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-11900K - €0.98 vs €1.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
187
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.52/FPS
64%
Price, €
€283.62
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €283.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15317 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
171
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€167.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €167.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15317 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |