Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 16% better in God of War than FX-8350 - 189 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - €155.88 vs €283.62
- Up to 36% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-11900K - €0.96 vs €1.5 per FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.5/FPS
64%
Price, €
€283.62
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €283.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1413 minutes ago
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1413 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |