Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 34% better in New World than Core i7-3770 - 135 vs 101 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - €154.27 vs €258.59
- Up to 20% better value when playing New World than Core i9-11900F - €1.53 vs €1.92 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.92/FPS
79%
Price, €
€258.59
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €258.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9182 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
101
74%
Value, €/FPS
€1.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€154.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €154.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |