Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1080 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-9500T - 452 vs 407 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9500T - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9500T
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - €159.99 vs €254.03
- Up to 30% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-11900F - €0.39 vs €0.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
452
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
69%
Price, €
€254.03
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for €254.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 1st, 2018
FPS
407
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€159.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €159.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i5-9500T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 1st, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |