Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F and the cheaper Core i3-10105F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-10105F - 146 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - €71.73 vs €254.06
- Up to 69% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-11900F - €0.54 vs €1.74 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.74/FPS
31%
Price, €
€254.06
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €254.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €71.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |