Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 245 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 452 vs 427 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 64 vs 16 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €572 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 272 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1655
76.23215108245049%
Multi-Core
14579
100%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 32 |
16 | Threads | 64 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |