Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 19% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-4100 - 376 vs 317 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - €20.59 vs €270.6
- Up to 92% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-11900 - €0.06 vs €0.72 per FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €270.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Buy for €20.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |