Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 1509 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 12% better in Far Cry 3 than Core i7-6700T - 152 vs 136 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - €131.88 vs €882.44
- Up to 83% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i9-10920X - €0.97 vs €5.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
152
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.81/FPS
16%
Price, €
€882.44
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €882.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
136
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
100%
Price, €
€131.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €131.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i7 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |