Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 284 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-9400F - 124 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 24 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - €148.13 vs €882.44
- Up to 83% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-10920X - €1.22 vs €7.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.12/FPS
17%
Price, €
€882.44
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €882.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
121
97%
Value, €/FPS
€1.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €148.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |