Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 1997 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 7% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-4690 - 132 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - €79.81 vs €665.91
- Up to 87% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-10900X - €0.65 vs €5.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 84 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.04/FPS
12%
Price, €
€665.91
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €665.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
123
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €79.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |