Buy on Amazon
€698.89
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 66% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Celeron G1620 - 108 vs 65 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 97% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - €20.16 vs €698.89
- Up to 95% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i9-10900X - €0.31 vs €6.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 55 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Core i9-10900X X-Serie Prozessor 10 Kerne mit 3.7 GHz (bis 4,7 GHz mit Turbo Boost 3.0, LGA2066 X299 Series 165W Prozessor (999PNG)
Buy for €698.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
65
60%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Verwendeter 2-Kern-2-Thread-Desktop-Prozessor 2,7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Celeron |
| Cascade Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 165 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
