Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 842 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than EPYC 7551P - 134 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 165 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900X - 64 vs 20 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.97/FPS
100%
Price, €
€665.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €665.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | EPYC |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
10 | Cores | 32 |
20 | Threads | 64 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |