Buy on Amazon
€329.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2191 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 11% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron G1840 - 503 vs 452 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Intel Core i9-10900KF (Basistakt: 3,70GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 125 Watt) Box
Buy for €329.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 325 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i9-10900KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
28.64435621100397%
Multi-Core
854
9.329254970504696%
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i9-10900KF or Celeron G1840
DOOM Eternal, 1920 x 1080, Nightmare
310 FPS
€16.14/FPS
GeForce RTX 3090
Core i9-10900KF
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€5,003.16
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
