Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 1410 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 4% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 317 vs 306 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
62.20697541452258%
Multi-Core
3898
42.54065262468624%
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
